The Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses remove the cameras for better battery life

All eyes were on Meta Connect 2026 . The annual hardware showcase is where the company debuts its latest wearables, and this year’s event comes at a time when anti-smart glasses sentiment seems to be at an all-time high — though that didn’t stop Meta showcasing several brand new pairs of specs. Smar

<![CDATA[ <article> <p>All eyes were on <a href="https://www.techradar.com/computing/virtual-reality-augmented-reality/7-things-to-expect-at-meta-connect-2026-from-camera-less-smart-glasses-to-meta-ray-ban-glasses-updates">Meta Connect 2026</a>. The annual hardware showcase is where the company debuts its latest wearables, and this year’s event comes at a time when <a href="https://www.techradar.com/computing/virtual-reality-augmented-reality/are-meta-smart-glasses-doomed-to-fail-like-google-glass-have-your-say-on-what-fate-is-most-likely-for-wearable-cameras">anti-smart glasses sentiment</a> seems to be at an all-time high — though that didn’t stop Meta showcasing several brand new pairs of specs.</p><p>Smart glasses are getting banned from offices, event spaces, pubs, and courtrooms (among other venues), and folks are expressing their uneasiness at being under the gaze of camera-equipped specs — especially given the potential for wearers to film those around them covertly.</p><div style="min-height: 250px;"> <div class="kwizly-quiz kwizly-Xk8PAe"></div> </div> <script src="https://kwizly.com/embed/Xk8PAe.js" async></script><p>Perhaps that’s why Meta has debuted, for the first time, smart glasses that entirely lack cameras, in the shape of the Ray-Ban Meta Audio — though in the pre-Connect briefing I had for the glasses (I’m writing this ahead of the showcase, so can’t speak for what Mark Zuckerberg will say in his version of the keynote) Meta didn’t attempt to link its Audio glasses with the privacy backlash.</p><p>Instead, Meta focused on the advantages of these glasses — chiefly their longer 12-hour battery life. We’ll need to see how this figure holds up in our day-to-day testing, though it sounds like these glasses will be able to provide AI assistance and music playback for much longer stretches of your day than previous models.</p><figure class="van-image-figure inline-layout" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:3840px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="eB6q83sxBaF3tSrLvvTRnL" name="Ray-Ban Meta Audio - Clubmaster1" alt="The Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eB6q83sxBaF3tSrLvvTRnL-1920-80.jpg" mos="" align="middle" fullscreen="" width="3840" height="2160" attribution="" endorsement="" class="inline"></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class=" inline-layout"><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Meta)</span></figcaption></figure><p>You’ll be able to enjoy wearing them for longer too. The specs now weigh just 43g (down from 49g for the lightest Gen 2 design), and they also boast some of the Ray-Ban Meta Optics’ (Meta's prescription glasses line) fit adjustments, like ergonomic hinges and adjustable temple tips. Based on my time wearing the Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses, these features help to make them some of Meta’s comfiest yet — though my demo was only for about 20 minutes or so which isn’t the same as all-day wear.</p><p>Audio performance is also getting a boost thanks to Dolby Atmos support. The glasses' microphones are much better at picking up an immersive soundscape, and the speakers are better at playing it back to you.</p><p>I heard a few examples in my demo where the video swapped between Atmos and standard Stereo playback, and the difference was night and day. With Atmos I felt so much more immersed.</p><p>If you’ve wanted to pick up a pair of smart glasses, but don’t want ones with a camera, these could be the specs for you when they launch on October 13, priced at $349 / £319 / AU$529.</p><figure class="van-image-figure inline-layout" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:3840px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="U8zUCtYG2w2cfghpTi6eKL" name="Ray-Ban Meta Audio - Clubmaster5" alt="The Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/U8zUCtYG2w2cfghpTi6eKL-1920-80.jpg" mos="" align="middle" fullscreen="" width="3840" height="2160" attribution="" endorsement="" class="inline"></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class=" inline-layout"><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Meta)</span></figcaption></figure><h2 id="problem-solved">Problem solved?</h2><p>Of course, Meta hasn’t abandoned its camera glasses — it just announced its Ray-Ban Meta Gen 3 model — and in my briefing Meta pushed back on claims its specs can be used covertly.</p><p>It described the recording indicator as being “a light you can’t miss,” and noted how it has improved its glasses’ tamper-protection features in recent updates. It didn’t provide details on if or how it will make the indicator more obvious (many I’ve spoken to would disagree with Meta’s “can’t miss” claim), though given the existential threat to its business the ‘perv glasses’ moniker poses, I expect more protections and safeguards are on the horizon (assuming they aren’t announced at Connect).</p><figure class="van-image-figure inline-layout" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1920px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="pzXjNig9SiB6CqcQ7tRmfL" name="Ray-Ban Meta Audio - Lifestyle3" alt="The Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pzXjNig9SiB6CqcQ7tRmfL-1920-80.jpg" mos="" align="middle" fullscreen="" width="1920" height="1080" attribution="" endorsement="" class="inline"></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class=" inline-layout"><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Meta)</span></figcaption></figure><p>Audio-only glasses present a partial solution to the issue. They can still capture audio of yourself and those around you, and aren’t as useful as camera-equipped glasses — you can’t provide visual context to the Muse AI, for example — but the lack of snappers also means they’re a lot less invasive.</p><p>And despite being more limited, the glasses can still offer some useful support. Meta has announced a new <a href="https://www.techradar.com/computing/virtual-reality-augmented-reality/glasses-is-the-ideal-form-factor-why-meta-is-bringing-hearing-enhancement-to-its-smart-glasses" target="_blank">Hearing Enhancement feature</a> for its specs. The feature is designed to help people with mild or moderate hearing loss enhance the audio of the world around them. It's not free, however, as it'll cost $14.99 a month (pricing outside the US TBC), or it'll come as part of a Meta One subscription.</p><p>Possible added costs aside, this feature is an incredible tool — and a showcase for the good things new tech like smart glasses can provide — and some of the Meta employees at the event told me it's the best thing they've worked on while at the company.</p><p>Besides the new Meta VR Glasses, the Ray-Ban Meta Audio are probably the glasses I’m most excited to experience, although camera-less specs aren’t my favorite, as they often lack audio capabilities and use a display — Meta’s specs are the opposite, with no display and Dolby Atmos audio, and that’s much more my style.</p><p>I want a casual audio experience with the occasional AI assistance, not a constant HUD that feels mildly useful at best, and annoyingly distracting at worst. I’ll be interested to see what others think, though.</p><figure class="van-image-figure inline-layout" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:3840px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="2QtT9VTxDeSSWrSh3NjQnL" name="Ray-Ban Meta - Group Shot2" alt="The Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2QtT9VTxDeSSWrSh3NjQnL-1920-80.jpg" mos="" align="middle" fullscreen="" width="3840" height="2160" attribution="" endorsement="" class="inline"></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class=" inline-layout"><span class="caption-text">The Meta Audio and Gen 3 Ray-Ban glasses </span><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Meta)</span></figcaption></figure><p>Will this camera-less design face less backlash, will it be widely accepted? Or has the negativity around smart specs gone too far for brands to be able to win people back?</p><p>I think there’s still time for smart glasses to be saved, though ignoring the cameras problem is only a half step. Better privacy protections are still needed, but we’ll have to wait and see who acts next — will Meta and others properly regulate themselves, will the court of public opinion continue to rule against 'perv glasses', or will government regulators take the decision out of everyone else’s hands? </p> </article> ]]>